Seismologists in recent years have recast their understanding of the inner workings of Earth from a relatively benign homogeneous environment to one that is highly dynamic and chemically diverse.

Surface topography and bathymetry around South America (top) overlays variable topography on Earth's upper mantle phase transition discontinuities at 410 km (middle) and 660 km (bottom) depth (topography is contoured in 2 km increments). Topography on the discontinuities is used to characterize compositional and thermal heterogeneity within the Earth. In this region, the large depressions are related to subduction processes, whereby cold oceanic lithosphere descends into the mantle. (Credit: Nicholas Schmerr, Edward Garnero, Arizona State University)

This new view of Earth's inner workings depicts the planet as a living organism where events that happen deep inside can affect what happens at its surface, like the rub and slip of tectonic plates and the rumble of the occasional volcano.
New research into these dynamic inner workings are now showing that Earth's upper mantle (an area that extends down to 660 km) exhibits how far more than just temperature and pressure play a role in the dynamics of the deep interior.

A study by Nicholas Schmerr, a doctoral student in Arizona State University's School of Earth and Space Exploration is shedding light on these processes and showing that they are not just temperature driven. His work helps assess the role chemistry plays in the structure of Earth's mantle.

The simplest model of the mantle -- the layer of the Earth's interior just beneath the crust -- is that of a convective heat engine. Like a pot of boiling water, the mantle has parts that are hot and welling up, as in the mid-Atlantic rift, and parts that are cooler and sinking, as in subduction zones. There, crust sinks into the Earth, mixing and transforming into different material "phases," like graphite turning into diamond.

"A great deal of past research on mantle structure has interpreted anomalous seismic observations as due to thermal variations within the mantle," Schmerr said. "We're trying to get people to think about how the interior of the Earth can be not just thermally different in different regions but also chemically different."

The research, which Schmerr conducted with Edward Garnero, a professor in ASU's School of Earth and Space Exploration, was published in the October 26 issue of the journal Science. Their article is titled "Upper Mantle Discontinuity Topography from Thermal and Chemical Heterogeneity."

Schmerr's work shows that Earth's interior is far from homogeneous, as represented in traditional views, but possesses an exotic brew of down and upwelling material that goes beyond simply hot and cold convection currents. His work demonstrates the need for a chemical component in the convection process.

At key depths within Earth, rock undergoes a compression to a denser material where its atoms rearrange due to the ever-increasing pressure. Earth scientists have long known that the dominant mineral olivine in Earth's outer shell, compresses into another mineral named wadsleyite at 410 km (255 mile) depth, which then changes into ringwoodite around 520 km (325 mile) depth and then again into perovskite + magnesiowüstite at 660 km (410 mile) depth.

These changes in crystal structure, called phase transitions, are sensitive to temperature and pressure, and the transition depth moves up and down in the mantle in response to relatively hot or cold material.

Beneath South America, Schmerr's research found the 410 km phase boundary bending the wrong way. The mantle beneath South America is predicted to be relatively cold due to cold and dense former oceanic crust and the underlying tectonic plate sinking into the planet from the subduction zone along the west coast. In such a region, the 410 km boundary would normally be upwarped, but using energy from far away earthquakes that reflect off the deep boundaries in this study area, Schmerr and Garnero found that the 410 km boundary significantly deepened.

"Our discovery of the 410 boundary deflecting downwards in this region is incompatible with previous assumptions of upper mantle phase boundaries being dominantly modulated by the cold temperature of the subducting crust and plate," Garnero said.

Geologists and geochemists have long suspected that subduction processes are driven by more than temperature alone. A sinking oceanic plate is compositionally distinct from the mantle, and brings with it minerals rich in elements that can alter the range of temperatures and pressures at which a phase change takes place.

"We're not the first to suggest chemical heterogeneities in the mantle, however, we are the first to suggest hydrogen or iron as an explanation for an observation at this level of detail and over a geographical region spanning several thousands of kilometers," Schmerr said.

Hydrogen from ocean water can be bonded to minerals within the crust and carried down as it is subducted into the mantle, Schmerr explained. When the plate reaches the 410 km phase boundary, the hydrogen affects the depth of the olivine to wadsleyite phase transition, reducing the density of the newly formed wadsleyite, and making it relatively more buoyant than its surrounding material. This hydrated wadsleyite then "pools" below the 410 km boundary, and the base of the wet zone reflects the seismic energy observed by Schmerr.

Alternatively, subduction can bring the iron-poor and magnesium-enriched residues of materials that melted near the surface to greater depths. Mantle mineral compositions enriched in magnesium are stable to greater depths than usual, resulting in a deeper phase transition.

"Either hypothesis explains our observation of a deep 410-km boundary beneath South American subduction, and both ideas invoke chemical heterogeneity," Schmerr said. "However, if we look deeper, at the 660-km phase transition, we find it at a depth consistent with the mantle being colder there. This tells us that the mantle beneath South America is both thermally cold and chemically different."

To make their observations, Schmerr and Garnero used data from the USArray, which is part of the National Science Foundation-funded EarthScope project.

"The USArray essentially is 500 seismometers that are deployed in a movable grid across the United States," Schmerr said. "It's an unheard of density of seismometers."

Schmerr and Garnero used seismic waves from earthquakes to measure where phase transitions occur in the interior of Earth by looking for where waves reflect off these boundaries. In particular, they used a set of seismic waves that reflect off the underside of phase transitions halfway between the earthquake and the seismometer. The density and other characteristics of the material they travel through affect how the waves move, and this gives geologists an idea of the structure of the inner Earth.

"Seismic discontinuities are abrupt changes in density and seismic wave speeds that usually occur where a mineral undergoes a phase change -- such as when olivine transitions to wadsleyite, or ringwoodite transforms into perovskite and magnesiowüstite. The transformed mineral is generally denser, and typically seismic waves travel faster through it as well. Discontinuities reflect seismic energy, which allows us to figure out how deep they are. They are found throughout the world at certain average depths -- in this case, at 410 and 660 km," Schmerr said. "Because these phase transitions are not always uniform, these layers are bumpy with ridges and troughs."

"Right now the big question that we have is about Earth's thermal state and its chemical state, and there are a lot of ways we can go about getting at that information," Schmerr said. "This study lets us look at one particular area in Earth and constrain the temperature and composition to a certain degree, imaging this structure inside the Earth and saying, These are not just thermal effects -- there's also some sort of chemical aspect to it as well."

Adapted from materials provided by Arizona State University.

Read More......



Spacewalking astronauts bolted a solar power tower to the international space station on Tuesday, completing an ambitious three-day moving process that ended with elation when the beam's giant solar panels began to unfurl.

Their joy turned to concern, however, when a rip was spotted in the second solar panel.

NASA needs to get the tower up and running to prevent malfunctioning station equipment from delaying the addition of a much-anticipated European research lab.

A massive rotary joint is supposed to make sure the solar panel wings on the right side of the space station are facing the sun. But the gear, which was installed in June, has been experiencing electrical current spikes for nearly two months.

The solar panels on the 17½-ton girder that was installed at its new location Tuesday were folded up like an accordion for the move, and the first one slowly was unfurled as the seven-hour spacewalk wrapped up, gleaming like gold in the sun.

The crew kept spacewalker Scott Parazynski and Douglas Wheelock apprised of the first solar wing's unfurling as they floated back inside. Their reaction: "Wow, that's great," and "Awesome!"

"It's a good day's work right there," Parazynski said.

The astronauts abruptly stopped the unfurling of the second panel, however, as soon as they saw the rip on the edge of the panel. The panel was almost completely unfurled when the rip was spotted. The astronauts beamed down photos of the torn and crumpled section so NASA can analyze them and determine the extent of the damage.

At Mission Control's request, the astronauts retracted the wing just a bit to ease the tension on it.

A spacewalking astronaut found black dust resembling metal shavings inside the motorized joint on Sunday. NASA has limited the joint's motion to prevent the debris from causing permanent damage, but that also limits the system's ability to generate power for the station.

Parazynski spent part of Tuesday inspecting the matching rotary joint that turns the space station's left set of solar wings toward the sun. NASA will examine images he gathered of the perfectly running unit to compare it to the malfunctioning one.

There were no shavings inside the joint, and Parazynski said everything looked pristine.

"It's right out of the shop, no debris whatsoever," he said.

Parazynski and Wheelock guided astronauts inside the station as they used a robotic arm to hook up the beam to the orbiting outpost's backbone. The spacewalkers then began installing bolts to hold the beam in place and connecting wires to provide power.

"Oh I love this job," Parazynski said as they worked 220 miles above southeast Asia. "Beautiful view."

Given the problems with the right rotary joint, NASA needs the power generated by the newly installed solar panels to proceed with the planned December launch of the European Space Agency's science lab, named Columbus.

That lab and a Japanese lab set to be delivered early next year will latch onto the new Harmony module that Discovery delivered last week.

The space agency added a day to Discovery's mission so spacewalking astronauts could conduct a detailed inspection of the troublesome joint. That work is scheduled for Thursday.

To make room for that inspection, managers canceled a shuttle thermal tile repair demonstration that was scheduled for that spacewalk. The test was added to the mission after a piece of fuel-tank foam gouged Endeavour's belly on the last shuttle flight in August.
advertisement

Any repairs to the malfunctioning gear would be put off until after Discovery departs.

Discovery is now scheduled to undock from the space station on Monday and return to Earth on November

Read More......



Google Inc is in active talks with number-two U.S. mobile carrier Verizon Wireless about putting Google applications on phones it offers, people familiar with the matter told Reuters on Tuesday.

"There are good useful talks going on and they could result in a deal," one of the sources said.

So far talks between the Web search leader and Verizon Wireless, owned by Verizon Communications and Vodafone Group Plc, revolve around technology and potential business models such as advertising-sponsored services, one of the people said.

Verizon Communications Chief Operating Officer Denny Strigl said during an investor call on Monday that the operator talks to a lot of companies including Google, but did not elaborate.

France Telecom on Tuesday denied its mobile business, Orange, was in talks with Google to introduce handsets running its software after it was named as a potential partner in a Wall Street Journal story earlier on Tuesday.

Google shares rose 2.3 percent on Tuesday to $694.77.

The Journal reported that Google was expected in two weeks to announce advanced software and services, enabling handset makers to sell Google-powered phones by mid-2008, citing people familiar with the matter. Google declined to comment.

Google has moved rapidly in the past year to extend its reach beyond text-based, pay-per-click Web search ads into a variety of new markets, including online video, television, radio and print advertising.

Google has also expanded into enterprise software, which has traditionally been Microsoft Corp's domain.

According to the Journal, the Google-powered phones are expected to meld several of its applications, including Google Maps, YouTube and Gmail.

The ground-breaking part of the plan, according to the newspaper, is Google's aim to make the phone's software "open," right down to the operating system which controls applications and interacts with hardware.

This will grant independent software developers access to the tools they need to build phone features, the Journal said.

(Reporting by Sinead Carew, Ritsuko Ando, Michele Gershberg and Justin Grant in New York, Astrid Wendlandt in Paris)

© Reuters2007All rights reserved

Read More......



Brazil has been named as the host nation for the 2014 football World Cup.

The South American country was the only one bidding to host the tournament, which was due to be staged on the continent under Fifa's rotation system.


Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said: "Soccer is more than a sport for us, it's a national passion."

Brazil have won the tournament a record five times and hosted the World Cup once before, in 1950, when they lost 2-1 in the final to Uruguay.

It is the first time the World Cup is being held in South America since Argentina hosted, and won, the 1978 tournament.

Brazil is setting aside around £550m to update its stadiums, including the Maracanã in Rio de Janeiro which hosted the 1950 World Cup final.

And that money will need to be spent wisely as Fifa's inspection report has identified 18 grounds with more than 40,000 capacity that could host games. These will be whittled down to nine or 10.

However, of the 18, four would have to be re-built from scratch and all of the others need to undergo substantial renovation.

So basic are the facilities at the moment that most of the stadia are not even equipped for television commentary.

Fifa president Blatter said, however, that he had been impressed by Brazil's plans for 2014 despite the fact they were the only bidders.

"The task was not easy - for us it was a real big challenge to have the same list of requirements and the same conditions for only one candidate," he said.

"There was an extraordinary presentation by the delegation and we witnessed that this World Cup will have such a big social and cultural impact in Brazil.

"This is the country that has given to the world the best football and the best footballers, and they are five times world champions."

Fifa's inspection report added: "Brazil has a rich history of hosting sporting and other international events.

"But the standards and demands of the World Cup will far surpass those of any other event staged in the history of Brazil in terms of magnitude and complexity.

"The inspection team wants Fifa experts to review the process and progress of host city selection to ensure that adequate financing is committed and secured."

As news filtered through, celebrations broke out in various towns around the country with fireworks and festivities set to continue into the night.

Around 100 people unfurled a green and yellow banner, emblazoned with the words 'The 2014 World Cup is ours', at the foot of the famous Christ the Redeemer statue which overlooks Rio.

Meanwhile, women's world champions Germany will host the 2011 Women's World Cup after beating off competition from Canada.
Story from BBC SPORT:

Read More......



U.S. State Department investigators looking into the shooting deaths of 17 Iraqis in Baghdad last month offered immunity deals to Blackwater security guards, The New York Times reported on Monday.

The investigators from the agency's investigative arm, the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, did not, however, have the authority to offer such immunity grants, the newspaper said, citing U.S. government officials.

The offers represent a potentially serious investigative misstep that could complicate efforts to prosecute Blackwater employees involved in the incident, the newspaper said.

The officials, who were not identified, said Justice Department prosecutors, who do have the authority to offer such deals, had no advance knowledge of the arrangement, the newspaper said.

Most of the Blackwater guards who took part in the September 16 incident were offered what officials described as limited-use immunity, the report said.

Limited-use immunity means the private security guards were promised they would not be prosecuted for anything they said in interviews with the authorities as long as their statements were true, the Times said.

North Carolina-based Blackwater has about 1,000 employees in Iraq who protect U.S. diplomats and other officials.

The FBI took control of the investigation from the State Department early this month.

A Justice Department spokesman had no comment. A State Department official said the department does not comment on ongoing investigations and referred questions to the FBI.

Foreign contractors in Iraq are immune from prosecution under Iraqi law under a decree issued by the U.S.-led Coalition Provisional Authority in 2004.

Read More......


Israel is the biggest polluter in the Eastern Mediterranean with 140 tons of heavy metals dumped into the sea every year.

By Philippe Khan


In a recent report by an environmental group, Israel has been named the biggest polluter in the Eastern Mediterranean with 140 tons of heavy metals dumped into the sea every year. But this is not the surprising news; as a matter of fact all the dumped waste is authorized by the government, therefore legal.

The report was issued by Zalul, a non-profit organization for the environment and conservation of the Red Sea. The organization was founded four years ago by prominent businesspeople, environmentalists, academics and public officials.

After winning its battle against fish cages that destroy the coral reefs of the Red Sea, Zalul is currently focusing on the wastewater permissions that are granted by the Israeli government.

According to the report, a government committee authorizes the discharge of 140 tons of heavy metals, 130 tons of pesticides, 5 tons of arsenic, 1,300 tons of ammonia and a ton of cyanide every year.

More than 100 permits for discharging water waste into the sea are authorized by the government, the State of the Sea Report for 2007 stated.

"The state of Israel's coastal waters is appalling," it said.

The Zalul report follows a previous one issued by the United Nations, which ranked Tel Aviv among the 10 most polluted places in the Mediterranean.

With problems such as coastal overdevelopment, over fishing and pollution affecting the 21 countries that share the Mediterranean, Israel is reluctant to confront its increasing pollution problems.

"There is a big problem in Israel confronting industries and municipalities and the government doesn't want to invest money," Yariv Abramovich, Zalul's managing director, told Reuters.

Meanwhile, the Environmental Protection Ministry defends the Israeli violations by claiming that its beaches are among the cleanest in the world.

According to Reuters, Israeli Minister of Environmental Protection, Gideon Ezra, says that his ministry lacks the manpower to enforce environmental regulations properly. "To make a real change I need a strong legal department in my office that can investigate and press charges against criminals who pollute”.

It seems that the Israeli government is unable to handle the pollution problem properly as its proposal to clean up the polluted Kishon River in Northern Israel includes building a pipeline that would take the waste directly into the sea.

Criticizing the proposal, Sagit Rogenstein, Zalul's national projects director, said: “We've been working with the ministry and bringing experts from abroad to prove there are ways of further reducing pollution from factories and the worst idea is to divert it to the sea.”

Source: AJP

Read More......
Thursday, October 25, 2007

On the ground in Israel/Palestine





We were on-the-ground witnesses to Israel’s strategy to drive out Palestinians in the occupied territories.


By Ray McGovern


I saw nothing that surprised me — but plenty that shocked me. Let me explain.

I had learned from books and newspapers about what happened in 1948 when 750,000 Palestinians were removed from their land in historic Palestine; about the results of the Israel-Arab war in 1967, which years later former Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin publicly admitted was started by Israel; and about the confiscation and settlement by Israelis of Palestinian lands in the territories that Israel has now occupied for over 40 years.

But there is a huge difference from book learning and personal experience.

During the five years I was stationed in Munich, in the shadow of Dachau, I had not only book learning but personal experience with the results of the terrible Holocaust.

And there was the quote from Santayana at the very end of the tours I led through the Dachau concentration camp, "Those who do not remember history are condemned to relive it."

I grew up in New York City, where many of our closest neighbors were Jewish refugees from Germany in the ’30s. None of my acquaintances knew much about the Arabs of Palestine, and there was great jubilation when they were forced to make way for the establishment of the new state of Israel in 1948

An exhibit at Yad Vashem, the Holocaust museum in West Jerusalem, elicited a sad reminder of how thousands of Jews fleeing from Hitler in the ’30s crowded onto ships to cross the Atlantic, only to find that they were not welcome in America and were turned back to face almost certain death in Nazi-occupied Europe.

Doris Kearns Goodwin’s account of that outrage, in her "No Ordinary Time," had brought me to tears.

Small wonder, I said to myself, that the Israeli people mean it when they say Never Again! Small wonder that they are reluctant to trust anyone, including the United States, to help defend them in time of need. No surprise that Israel decided that only overwhelming force, including nuclear weapons, can ensure its existence.

* What a nation tolerates?

At the entrance to the Israeli Holocaust museum hung a prominent quote from the writer Kurt Tucholsky: "A country is not just what it does — it is also what it tolerates."

And I remember thinking, "Yes, those Germans who tolerated it all; those Germans who knew better but did nothing to stop the Holocaust!"

As our tour progressed, however, and I witnessed the plight of Palestinians in the occupied territories, I began to ask why it is that so few Israelis seem to care about the oppression of those living there, and how so many Americans can acquiesce in their tax dollars supporting the slow-burn holocaust in the occupied territories.

And driving through the West Bank I was reminded of President George W. Bush’s comment after flying over the Palestinian camps on a trip as governor of Texas. "Looked real bad down there," he said with a frown. Then he said it was time to end America’s efforts in the region. "I don’t see much we can do over there at this point," he said at the first National Security Council meeting of his administration (Jan. 30, 2001).

No more honest broker role for the U.S. The message was clear to the Israelis: They were now free to resolve the dispute as they saw fit. And the result is as sad as it was predictable.

Indeed, then-Secretary of State Colin Powell warned that a pullback by the U.S. would unleash Sharon and the Israeli army, but Bush shrugged that off saying, "Sometimes a show of strength by one side can really clarify things. (This first-hand account comes from then-Secretary of the Treasury, Paul O’Neill, who was there.)

Our delegation was sad witness to how the Israeli leaders decided to "clarify things."

Israeli bulldozers uprooting 300-year-old olive trees; hillsides denuded of trees to clear the land for gleaming alabaster Israeli settlements on every high hilltop; huge boulders or "checkpoints" on every through-road; Palestinian houses leveled to make way for a huge concrete wall — bigger and longer than what I had to contend with in divided Berlin during the Cold War.

We were on-the-ground witnesses to Israel’s long-term strategy to marginalize and, if possible, drive out the four million Palestinians in the occupied territories by destroying the infrastructure of the Palestinian government, economy, and civil society.

And the supreme irony of it all. As though overwhelming force can bring true security, in this modern age when everyone with access to Google images and maps and a mortar or artillery piece can wreak havoc using what the Pentagon calls "asymmetrical warfare."

How myopic the policy; and how contrived the attempted justification.

One prominent Jewish settler offered a simple explanation: The Bible says God wants us to have the land, so we can worship God as God wants us to. He quoted Deuteronomy 15:4 — "Since the Lord your God will bless you abundantly in the land God will give you as your heritage, there shall be no poor among you."

We told the settler we thought the Bible made it clear that God was concerned first and foremost that we do Justice and that he was giving inordinate emphasis to the subordinate clause of the Dt 15:4, and that God’s overarching mandate was that there shall be no poor among you in the land given you.

The answer we got was that Justice is not first and foremost in God’s vision: rather it is the land...and the land was promised to the Jews.

It was helpful to hear this thinking first-hand and hear how firmly this tenet has taken hold among the settlers on land confiscated from the Palestinians.

One of our delegation reminded us of our government’s enabling role in all this, and of the words of a Holocaust survivor: "Thou shalt not be a victim; thou shat not be a perpetrator; above all, thou shalt not be a bystander."

As mentioned above, the experience was not really a surprise, but none of us were prepared to see translated into human flesh, field, and habitat, the oppressive policies about which we had heard.

We emerged with a new determination to do our part to see Justice for all the parties concerned. For a country is not just what it does — it is also what it tolerates.

-- Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, the publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in Washington, DC. He was an analyst with the CIA for 27 years and is now on the Steering Group of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS). His e-mail is RRMcGovern@aol.com.

ConsortiumNews
Source: Middle East Online

Read More......



Oil prices headed back toward record highs after an unexpected fall in US stockpiles of crude sparked supply fears ahead of the winter months.


US sweet, light crude rose $1.83 to $87.10 a barrel, while London Brent climbed $1.52 to $84.37.

US crude oil stocks fell by 5.3 million barrels last week, government data showed, when analysts had been expecting a rise in inventory.

Oil rose to a peak of $90.07 last week due to a weak dollar and supply fears.

Geopolitical tensions, with Turkish fighters flying raids along the Iraqi border on Kurdish rebel positions, have also been a factor in the oil price rally.

But prices slipped at the beginning of this week on concerns about the health of US economy and expectations of more output from Opec.

"The debate remains very much alive as to whether the oil market remains seriously under-supplied going into winter," investment bank Citigroup said.

"A move north of $95 or a move south of $80 both appear possible right now."

A weaker US dollar makes oil a more attractive investment for holders of other currencies.

Read More......



An incomplete partition in Iraq is a dangerous situation, exacerbated by U.S arming and training of all factions.

By Ivan Eland

In an otherwise divisive, partisan debate on the Iraq war, the 75-23 bipartisan Senate vote to divide Iraq into autonomous regions was astounding. People who disagree on everything else about Iraq, such as conservative Republican Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas and liberal Democrat Barbara Boxer of California, voted in favor of the non-binding measure.

The Bush administration and the international community, made up of many states that have their own restive minority populations, have been reluctant to reconcile themselves to the pragmatic Senate admission that Iraq is unlikely to have a unified democratic government.

The difference is that the Bush administration and the international community don’t have to face angry U.S. voters next year and many senators do. The Senate is grasping for anything that could stabilize Iraq before the 2008 election and realizes that unified, democratic government is unnecessary—and even counterproductive—toward that end.

The ugly fact is that an incomplete and unratified partition of Iraq already exists on the ground and cannot be undone. Ethnic cleansing has separated populations, and local militias are providing security and services.

Twentieth-century partitions, some violence-riddled, some more successful, offer guidance on how best to proceed.

One of the lessons learned from the violent partition of South Asia into India and Pakistan in 1947 and the partitioning of Ireland in 1921 is that incomplete partitions are a recipe for violence and that substantial minorities, which threaten the majority population, should not be left on the wrong side of the partition line.

When the British divided South Asia into India and Pakistan, the well-armed Sikhs dreaded Muslim rule and wanted their own independent state or at least to be incorporated into India; but 2 million of them would have been stranded in Pakistan.

Also, the region of Kashmir, which was two-thirds Muslim, was not partitioned at all. As a result, a war between India and Pakistan in 1947 and 1948 allowed India to take most of the province and left a substantial concentration of Muslims in the Indian part of Kashmir.

The long-term violence in Protestant-dominated Northern Ireland resulted from a substantial Catholic community being left in the north (34 percent of Northern Ireland’s population) after the island was partitioned. Had these predominantly Catholic areas been allowed to go with the southern Republic of Ireland, most of this tragic violence could have been avoided.

Thus, an incomplete and unratified partition on the ground in Iraq is a dangerous situation, exacerbated by U.S arming and training of all factions, now including the Sunnis, which could make the ongoing civil war even worse.

Another lesson to be learned from the partition of South Asia is that population movements need to be encouraged, rather than discouraged, carefully orchestrated and protected with security forces. Financial incentives could be given to spur their movement.

The lessons of the partition of Palestine in 1948 are that all parties must agree to the partition (the Arabs didn’t), the partition should not be imposed by an outside power (the United Nations), and that defensible borders must be created for the resulting governments.

In Iraq, a nationwide conclave must be held to work out the details of the division and draw the lines. The threat of a rapid U.S. troop withdrawal could be used as a catalyst to get the Shia and the Kurds, who dominate the Iraqi government, propped up by U.S. forces, to give the Sunnis oil fields, thus speeding their current evolution toward supporting a decentralization of Iraq.

Source: Middle East Online

Read More......




By Daisuke Wakabayashi

Microsoft Corp beat out Google Inc on Wednesday in a battle to invest in socializing Web site Facebook, agreeing to pay $240 million for a 1.6 percent stake in the Web phenomenon.


Microsoft also clinched exclusive rights to sell ads on Facebook outside of the United States as part of the investment that valued Facebook at $15 billion -- on par with the market capitalizations of retailer Gap Inc and hotel chain Marriott International Inc.

Analysts said Microsoft paid a steep price on a bet that the three-year-old company would be able to transform itself into a hub for all sorts of Web activity.

"The only way this works is if Facebook becomes sort of the users' operating system on the Internet -- everyone logs into Facebook every day to get in contact with their friends and use a multitude of future applications that will be developed for it," said Morningstar analyst Toan Tran.

Facebook, a social network that lets friends share information, allows outside developers to create games and other applications for its site.

The popularity and depth of knowledge Facebook has about its users makes it valuable to companies like Microsoft and Google which want to sell advertising targeted to individual preferences.

Founded in 2004 by Harvard student Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook said it registers 250,000 new users a day, 60 percent of whom come from outside the United States.

Kevin Johnson, president of Microsoft's platform and services division, said the $15 billion price tag for Facebook is based on Microsoft's belief that the site could eventually reach 300 million users, who can be targeted for advertising. It has nearly 50 million today.

"You combine the number of users with the monetization opportunities and you can figure out a fairly modest average revenue per user per year and you can very quickly get to this level of valuation," Johnson said in a conference call with analysts and reporters.

Microsoft has stepped up efforts to be a player in the $40 billion market for online advertising, which the company expects to double in size within three years. It paid $6 billion to acquire digital advertising firm aQuantive in August.

Under the Facebook deal, Microsoft would be the exclusive third-party advertising platform for Facebook extending a previous deal for Microsoft to sell banner advertising next to Facebook member profiles in the U.S. until 2011.

GOOGLE VS. MICROSOFT

Google and Microsoft, now rivals for Internet-based audiences and applications, have butted heads before for Internet properties. Google beat Microsoft with a $1.65 billion acquisition of online video sharing site YouTube last year.

Forrester Research analyst Charlene Li said that Microsoft was a better strategic fit for Facebook, since it knew how to work with software developers and build computing environments -- such as its Windows operating system.

"Microsoft is a company that knows how to build platforms, knows how to develop relationships with developers. Microsoft developed the network that is the biggest, most vibrant one out there," she said. "Google didn't bring as much to the deal."

Facebook opened its doors to users beyond an original base of college students a year ago. It also opened the doors to outside developers and there are tens of thousands of developers writing Facebook applications, the company said.

Microsoft was one of many suitors looking to participate in its latest round of financing, said Facebook Vice President Owen Van Natta. The funds will go toward doubling the company's staff over the next year and other growth initiatives.

Google Co-founder Sergey Brin told a meeting with Wall Street analysts at the company's Silicon Valley headquarters that his company could partner with important Web sites.

"We don't feel, at a higher level, that we need to own every successful company on the Internet," said Brin, who later told reporters that Microsoft may have overbid.

Google has a multiyear deal with MySpace, the largest social network, to provide search and advertising alongside MySpace's 110 million user profiles.

Eric Schmidt, Google's CEO, told reporters that its pact with MySpace is performing better than originally expected.

Shares of Microsoft rose slightly to $31.60 from a Nasdaq close of $31.25, while Google ticked down to $675.30 from a close of $675.82.

(Additional reporting by Eric Auchard in San Francisco, Paul Thomasch in New York)

© Reuters2007All rights reserved

Read More......





"Many of Israel's laws and practices violate the 1966 Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination," UN human rights envoy John Dugard said.

By Amina Anderson


It’s highly unlikely to hear fierce criticism against Israel or the United States from somebody with a serious job title. But John Dugard, the special rapporteur to the UN Human Rights Council for the Palestinian territories, proved otherwise.

Earlier this year, the retired South African law professor wrote a report for the UN General Assembly in which he compared Israel’s actions to those of apartheid South Africa.

According to the BBC, the word “apartheid" appeared 24 times in the 24-page report.

"It is difficult to resist the conclusion that many of Israel's laws and practices violate the 1966 Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination," the report said.

Although Dugard has been visiting the occupied West Bank and Gaza for the past seven years, his position as a UN human rights monitor doesn’t allow him to make any decisions on UN policy; only to offer recommendations and critical analysis.

But now it seems that Mr Dugard is fed up. He used to accuse Israel of collectively punishing the Palestinians, but now he also holds the international community, and the United Nations itself, responsible for the Palestinians’ suffering.

A few week ago, Mr Dugard was reported to have criticised the UN Secretary General for failing to stand up to Israel. In a recent interview with the BBC, he said that his catalogues of what he sees as Israeli human rights abuses in the occupied Palestinian territories fall on "deaf ears" in the Secretary General's office.

He also said that he would urge the United Nations to withdraw from the "Quartet" of Middle East mediators -- which includes the U.S., Russia, EU and UN -- unless it properly addresses Palestinian human rights.

"In my most recent report to the General Assembly, which I will present later this month, I will suggest that the Secretary General withdraw the UN from the Quartet, if the Quartet fails to have regard to the human rights situation in the Palestinian Territories," he told the BBC.

Instead of overseeing the “peace process” between the Israelis and the Palestinians, the Quartet is hampering the Palestinian right to self-determination, Mr Dugard says.

His argument is not just that the Quartet is failing to heal the rift between the resistance group Hamas, which controls Gaza, and President Mahmoud Abbas’ Fatah faction, but that the UN, through the Quartet, is siding with the president’s party.

“The weak response by the quartet is because it’s heavily influenced" by the U.S.,” he said. “The UN is not playing the role of an objective mediator that behoves it.”

Mr Dugard also warned that Palestinian leaders have high hopes about next month’s peace conference with the Israelis. He fears that a third intifada, or uprising, could be unleashed if the Palestinians’ expectations are not met.

According to the BBC, many Western diplomats and UN officials based in the Middle East agree with Mr Dugard’s political analysis, but most of them are not as outspoken as him.

Even inside Israel, many believe that the occupation has distorted and damaged Israel’s global image. Some Israelis also agree with Mr Dugard that the occupation is fuelling the Palestinian resistance.

Mr Dugard even compared the actions of Palestinian fighters to those of the French Resistance during World War II.

"History is replete with examples of populations that have resisted military occupation," he said. "I can't see why one shouldn't draw these analogies."
Source: AJP

Read More......



In attacking Syria, Israel committed a blatant act of aggression against its northern neighbor of the kind denounced as the "supreme international crime" by the Nuremberg war crimes tribunal.

By Jonathan Cook


Israel's air strike on northern Syria last month should be understood in the context of events unfolding since its assault last summer on neighboring Lebanon.

From the leaks so far, it seems that more than half a dozen Israeli warplanes violated Syrian airspace to drop munitions on a site close to the border with Turkey. We also know from the U.S. media that the raid occurred in close coordination with the White House. But what was the purpose and significance of the attack?

It is worth recalling that, in the wake of Israel's month-long war against Lebanon a year ago, a prominent American neoconservative, Meyrav Wurmser, wife of Vice-President Dick Cheney's recently departed Middle East adviser, explained that the war had dragged on because the White House delayed in imposing a ceasefire. The neocons, she said, wanted to give Israel the time and space to expand the attack to Damascus.

The reasoning was simple: before an attack on Iran could be countenanced, Hezbollah in Lebanon had to be destroyed and Syria at the very least cowed. The plan was to isolate Tehran on these two other hostile fronts before going in for the kill.

But faced with constant rocket fire from Hezbollah last summer, Israel's public and military nerves frayed at the first hurdle. Instead Israel and the U.S. were forced to settle for a Security Council resolution rather than a decisive military victory.

The immediate fallout of the failed attack was an apparent waning of neocon influence. The group's program of "creative destruction" in the Middle East -- the encouragement of regional civil war and the partition of large states that threaten Israel -- was at risk of being shunted aside.

Instead the "pragmatists" in the Bush Administration, led by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and the new Defense Secretary Robert Gates, demanded a change of tack. The standoff reached a head in late 2006 when oilman James Baker and his Iraq Study Group began lobbying for a gradual withdrawal from Iraq -- presumably only after a dictator, this one more reliable, had again been installed in Baghdad. It looked as if the neocons' day in the sun had finally passed.

Israel's leadership understood the gravity of the moment. In January 2007 the Herzliya conference, an annual festival of strategy-making, invited no less than 40 Washington opinion-formers to join the usual throng of Israeli politicians, generals, journalists and academics. For a week the Israeli and American delegates spoke as one: Iran and its presumed proxy, Hezbollah, were bent on the "genocidal destruction" of Israel. Tehran's development of a nuclear program -- whether for civilian use, as Iran argues, or for military use, as the U.S. and Israel claim -- had to be stopped at all costs.

While the White House turned uncharacteristically quiet all spring and summer about what it planned to do next, rumors that Israel was pondering a go-it-alone strike against Iran grew noisier by the day. Ex-Mossad officers warned of an inevitable third world war, Israeli military intelligence advised that Iran was only months away from the point of no return on developing a nuclear warhead, prominent leaks in sympathetic media revealed bombing runs to Gibraltar, and Israel started upping the pressure on several tens of thousands of Jews in Tehran to flee their homes and come to Israel.

While Western analysts opined that an attack on Iran was growing unlikely, Israel's neighbors watched nervously through the first half of the year as the vague impression of a regional war came ever more sharply into focus. In particular Syria, after witnessing the whirlwind of savagery unleashed against Lebanon last summer, feared it was next in line in the U.S.-Israeli campaign to break Tehran's network of regional alliances. It deduced, probably correctly, that neither the U.S. nor Israel would dare attack Iran without first clobbering Hezbollah and Damascus.

For some time Syria had been left in no doubt of the mood in Washington. It failed to end its pariah status in the post-9/11 period, despite helping the CIA with intelligence on al-Qaeda and secretly trying to make peace with Israel over the running sore of the occupied Golan Heights. It was rebuffed at every turn.

So as the clouds of war grew darker in the spring, Syria responded as might be expected. It went to the arms market in Moscow and bought up the displays of anti-aircraft missiles as well as anti-tank weapons of the kind Hezbollah demonstrated last summer were so effective at repelling Israel's planned ground invasion of south Lebanon.

As the Israeli military historian Martin van Creveld reluctantly conceded earlier this year, U.S. policy was forcing Damascus to remain within Iran's uncomfortable embrace: "Syrian President Bashar al-Assad finds himself more dependent on his Iranian counterpart, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, than perhaps he would like."

Israel, never missing an opportunity to wilfully misrepresent the behavior of an enemy, called the Syrian military build-up proof of Damascus' appetite for war. Apparently fearful that Syria might initiate a war by mistaking the signals from Israel as evidence of aggressive intentions, the Israeli prime minister, Ehud Olmert, urged Syria to avoid a "miscalculation". The Israeli public spent the summer braced for a far more dangerous repeat of last summer's war along the northern border.

It was at this point -- with tensions simmeringly hot -- that Israel launched its strike, sending several fighter planes into Syria on a lightning mission to hit a site near Dayr a-Zawr. As Syria itself broke the news of the attack, Israeli generals were shown on TV toasting in the Jewish new year but refusing to comment.

Details have remained thin on the ground ever since: Israel imposed a news blackout that has been strictly enforced by the country's military censor. Instead it has been left to the Western media to speculate on what occurred.

One point that none of the pundits and analysts have noted was that, in attacking Syria, Israel committed a blatant act of aggression against its northern neighbor of the kind denounced as the "supreme international crime" by the Nuremberg war crimes tribunal.

Also, no one pointed out the obvious double standard applied to Israel's attack on Syria compared to the far less significant violation of Israeli sovereignty by Hezbollah a year earlier, when it captured two Israel soldiers at a border post and killed three more. Hezbollah's act was widely accepted as justification for the bombardment and destruction of much of Lebanon, even if a few sensitive souls agonized over whether Israel's response was "disproportionate". Would these commentators now approve of similar retaliation by Syria?

The question was doubtless considered unimportant because it was clear from Western coverage that no one -- including the Israeli leadership -- believed Syria was in a position to respond militarily to Israel's attack. Olmert's fear of a Syrian "miscalculation" evaporated the moment Israel did the maths for Damascus.

So what did Israel hope to achieve with its aerial strike?

The stories emerging from the less gagged American media suggest two scenarios. The first is that Israel targeted Iranian supplies passing through Syria on their way to Hezbollah; the second that Israel struck at a fledgling Syrian nuclear plant where materials from North Korea were being offloaded, possibly as part of a joint nuclear effort by Damascus and Tehran.

(Speculation that Israel was testing Syria's anti-aircraft defences in preparation for an attack on Iran ignores the fact that the Israeli air force would almost certainly choose a flightpath through friendlier Jordanian airspace.)

How credible are these two scenarios?

The nuclear claims against Damascus were discounted so quickly by experts of the region that Washington was soon downgrading the accusation to claims that Syria was only hiding the material on North Korea's behalf. But why would Syria, already hounded by Israel and the U.S., provide such a readymade pretext for still harsher treatment? Why, equally, would North Korea undermine its hard-won disarmament deal with the U.S.? And why, if Syria were covertly engaging in nuclear mischief, did it alert the world to the fact by revealing the Israeli air strike?

The other justification for the attack was at least based in a more credible reality: Damascus, Hezbollah and Iran undoubtedly do share some military resources. But their alliance should be seen as the kind of defensive pact needed by vulnerable actors in a Sunni-dominated region where the U.S. wants unlimited control of Gulf oil and supports only those repressive regimes that cooperate on its terms. All three are keenly aware that it is Israel's job to threaten and punish any regimes that fail to toe the line.

Contrary to the impression being created in the West, "genocidal hatred" of Israel and Jews, however often Ahmadinejad's speeches are mistranslated, is not the engine of these countries' alliance.

Nonetheless, the political significance of the justifications for the Israeli air strike is that both neatly tie together various strands of an argument needed by the neocons and Israel in making their case for an attack on Iran before Bush leaves office in early 2009. Each scenario suggests a Shia "axis of evil", coordinated by Iran, that is "actively plotting Israel's destruction". And each story offers the pretext for an attack on Syria as a prelude to a pre-emptive strike against Tehran -- launched either by Washington or Tel Aviv -- "to save Israel".

That these stories appear to have been planted in the American media by neocon fanatics like John Bolton is warning enough -- as is the admission that the only evidence for Syrian malfeasance is Israeli "intelligence".

It should hardly need pointing out that we are again in a hall of mirrors, as we were during the period leading up to America's invasion of Iraq and have been during its subsequent occupation.

Bush's "war on terror" was originally justified with the convenient and manufactured links between Iraq and al-Qaeda, as well as, of course, those WMDs that, it later turned out, had been destroyed years earlier. But ever since Tehran has invariably been the ultimate target of these improbable confections.

There were the forged documents proving both that Iraq had imported enriched uranium from Niger to manufacture nuclear warheads and that it was sharing its nuclear know-how with Iran. And as Iraq fell apart, neocon operatives like Michael Ledeen lost no time in spreading rumors that the missing nuclear arsenal could still be accounted for: Iranian agents had simply smuggled it out of Iraq during the chaos of the U.S. invasion.

Since then our media have proved that they have no less of an appetite for such preposterous tales. If Iran's involvement in stirring up its fellow Shia in Iraq against the U.S. occupation is at least possible, the same cannot be said of the regular White House claims that Tehran is behind the Sunni-led fighters in Iraq and Afghanistan. A few months ago the news media served up "revelations" that Iran was secretly conspiring with al-Qaeda and Iraq's Sunni fighters to oust the U.S. occupiers.

So what purpose does the constant innuendo against Tehran serve?

The latest accusations should be seen as an example of Israel and the neocons "creating their own reality", as one Bush adviser famously observed of the neocon philosophy of power. The more that Hezbollah, Syria and Iran are menaced by Israel, the more they are forced to huddle together and behave in ways to protect themselves -- such as arming -- that can be portrayed as a "genocidal" threat to Israel and world order.

Van Creveld once observed that Tehran would be "crazy" not to develop nuclear weapons given the clear trajectory of Israeli and U.S. machinations to overthrow the regime. So equally Syria cannot afford to jettison its alliance with Iran or its involvement with Hezbollah. In the current reality, these connections are the only power it has to deter an attack or force the U.S. and Israel to negotiate.

But they are also the evidence needed by Israel and the neocons to convict Syria and Iran in the court of Washington opinion. The attack on Syria is part of a clever hustle, one designed to vanquish or bypass the doubters in the Bush Administration, both by proving Syria's culpability and by provoking it to respond.

Condoleezza Rice wants to invite Syria to attend the regional peace conference that has been called by President Bush for November. There can be no doubt that such an act of détente is deeply opposed by both Israel and the neocons. It reverses their strategy of implicating Damascus in the "Shia arc of extremism" and of paving the way to an attack on the real target: Iran.

Syria, meanwhile, is fighting back, as it has been for some time, with the only means available: the diplomatic offensive. For two years Bashar al-Assad has been offering a generous peace deal to Israel on the Golan Heights that Tel Aviv has refused to consider. Last month, Syria made a further gesture towards peace with an offer on another piece of territory occupied by Israel, the Shebaa Farms. Under the plan, the Farms -- which the United Nations now agrees belongs to Lebanon, but which Israel still claims is Syrian and cannot be returned until there is a deal on the Golan Heights -- would be transferred to UN custody until the dispute over its sovereignty can be resolved.

Were either of Damascus' initiatives to be pursued, the region might be looking forward to a period of relative calm and security. Which is reason enough why Israel and the neocons are so bitterly opposed. Instead they must establish a new reality -- one in which the forces of "creative destruction" so beloved of the neocons engulf yet more of the region. For the rest of us, a simpler vocabulary suffices. What is being sold is catastrophe.

-- Jonathan Cook is a writer and journalist based in Nazareth, Israel. He is the author of 'Blood and Religion: The Unmasking of the Jewish and Democratic State' published by Pluto Press, and available in the United States from the University of Michigan Press. His website is www.jkcook.net
Source: Middle East Online

Read More......
Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Abuse fight targets social sites



Social networking sites are being urged to do more to protect young people.
The Child Exploitation and Online Protection centre (CEOP) wants the sites to install its "report abuse" button that connects people to police.

CEOP research shows some sex offenders are starting to use social network sites, such as MySpace, Bebo and Facebook, to seek out victims.

Jim Gamble, head of CEOP, says: "The more children go on social networks, the more offenders follow them."

Direct connection

The button lets people report instances when they suffer or witness inappropriate sexual contact. In August 2006 Microsoft agreed to put the distinctive red icon on the of its instant messenger service - MSN Messenger.

CEOP research shows that, while chatrooms and instant messaging services are the main places sex offenders go in search of victims, social networks are attracting them too.

Latest figures show that around one million children under 16 use Bebo, while 600,000 minors are on MySpace.

The networking sites say they make it simple for users to report abuse, though those reports usually go to the site administrators rather than the authorities.

Mr Gamble says that is not enough: "When you are talking about the public in jeopardy and vulnerable, they need to contact law enforcement as soon as possible."

The agency was set up in April 2006 and brings together the police, government departments and charities to combat child sex offenders.

In the US social network sites are under pressure from politicians who want them to do more to protect their most vulnerable users.

American law enforcement agencies are also seeking to make the social network sites introduce checks to prevent under-age users from coming to the sites and to keep sexual predators at bay.

All the networks make new users reveal their age when they sign up, but there is disagreement about whether any new system of age verification would be effective.

MySpace says anyone under 14 is banned from using its service.

A spokesman said: "MySpace has developed search methodology and algorithms to seek out underage users, relying on several thousand terms commonly used by under-age users to identify them and delete their profiles."

MySpace and other networks also scan profiles for clues that users are older than they claim to be.

In Britain the Home Office is preparing new guidelines for social networks. CEOP says it is also having useful discussions with the companies about improving safety.

At Greenford High School in West London students have made a film about social networking and its dangers, with scenarios illustrating how easily young people can be tricked.

It seems to have worked. All the pupils we spoke to said they would never accept anyone as a "friend" on Facebook or Bebo unless they knew them.

Read More......

Microsoft Corp. (MSFT.O: Quote, Profile, Research) introduced software on Monday to manage advanced mobile phones much like personal computers, taking aim at a business dominated by Research in Motion's (RIM.TO: Quote, Profile, Research)(RIMM.O: Quote, Profile, Research) BlackBerry.

Mobile devices are acquiring the computing firepower to become crucial productivity tools for business people and management nightmares for technology administrators.

"The IT (information technology) folks, the same as it was in the PC environment, don't want to roll out 10,000 devices. They want roll out one device 10,000 times," said Michael Gartenberg, analyst at Jupiter Research. "Microsoft is hoping to replicate the success and the model of the PC."

The world's largest software maker will unveil software dedicated to managing devices using its Windows Mobile platform during CEO Steve Ballmer's keynote speech on Tuesday at the CTIA wireless conference in San Francisco.

The Microsoft System Center Mobile Device Manager 2008 will allow technology administrators to send applications to phones, control security and generally simplify management of devices which are becoming more and more complex.

This positions Windows Mobile devices, which have been sold mainly through retail shops, to appeal to organizations who buy phones in bulk to distribute to their workforce. It's a market dominated by Research in Motion's BlackBerry.

Rob Enderle, industry analyst at the Enderle Group, said the market for smart phones, advanced phones with many PC-like attributes, is still evolving and many companies like Microsoft and Apple Inc. (AAPL.O: Quote, Profile, Research) are targeting RIM's lead.

"The market for smart phones is still largely under penetrated," said Enderle, who provides advice and industry insight to Microsoft. "RIM has a number of reasons to be concerned, (and it's) not just Microsoft."

Microsoft, which has declined to comment on persistent rumors that it is interested in acquiring RIM to tap into the company's corporate customers, said reaching out to large organizations is a critical part of its goal to sell over 20 million Windows Mobile licenses in fiscal year 2008, which ends next June.

"This is a key part of accelerating our business," said Scott Horn, general manager of marketing at Microsoft's Windows Mobile business. "You're going to see (Mobile Device Manager) really ramp up in fiscal 2009 starting July 1."

COMPETITION WITH BLACKBERRY

RIM has been working for years to extend the capabilities of its BlackBerry devices beyond its trademark wireless e-mail service, offering applications that allow workers to access company data and collaborate.

The advantage that RIM holds over Microsoft, according to Enderle, is that RIM makes both the software and hardware. It also offers the services to help companies deploy the devices, providing a cohesive single offering.

Microsoft said it formed a partnership with a service company called Enterprise Mobile to build and deploy Windows Mobile phones customized for different organizations, working with a number of wireless carriers and handset manufacturers.

New phones supporting the Mobile Device Manager software will be available in the second quarter of 2008 from Samsung Electronics (005930.KS: Quote, Profile, Research), Palm Inc. (PALM.O: Quote, Profile, Research), Motorola Inc. (MOT.N: Quote, Profile, Research) and other device manufacturers.

The server software will be released in the first half of next year, according to Microsoft.

Microsoft said the average Windows Mobile smartphone now has the processing power, storage and graphics capabilities of computers from 7 or 8 years ago. They also run on more powerful networks to open up the device to new applications.

(Additional reporting by Wojtek Dabrowski in Toronto)

© Reuters2007All rights reserved

Read More......





Film star Tom Cruise spent more than two hours signing autographs and greeting fans in London on Monday at the world premiere of his new movie "Lions for Lambs", Hollywood's latest examination of U.S. foreign policy.

"Lions for Lambs", which follows a slew of films related to the war in Iraq and the U.S. military response to the September 11, 2001 attacks, is about two soldiers serving in Afghanistan and political intrigue back in the United States.

Directed by Robert Redford and also starring Meryl Streep, the film has been branded "anti-war" by some media, and its backers are hoping its controversial subject matter will boost it at the box office and going into the awards season.

"I think that films like this are interesting and important and I think it's anyone's place if they want to do it," Cruise told Reuters on the red carpet ahead of the premiere at the London Film Festival.

"We are free to communicate about anything we want and any subject we want, so I think it's absolutely correct."

Asked if he studied any politician in particular for his role as an ambitious senator, 45-year-old Cruise said:

"I studied many. I'll never tell exactly who, but there's many months of research that went into this character to not make him into a caricature but into a human being with real problems and to reflect that idea."

Streep, who plays a journalist in "Lions for Lambs", was not at the premiere, while Redford avoided the media glare and slipped into the cinema via the back entrance.

The film is due to open in U.S. cinemas on November 9.

© Reuters2007All rights reserved

Read More......


Fast-moving wildfires roared across California on Monday and engulfed large swaths of San Diego County, where 250,000 people were told to evacuate as state officials called in National Guard troops.

More than a dozen fires, driven by gale-force winds, burned out of control across the drought-stricken southern half of the state, quickly charring about 200,000 acres, killing one person and injuring a number of others.
With fire crews and state emergency services overwhelmed, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said 1,500 National Guard troops had been summoned, including 200 from the Mexican border, to help with firefighting, evacuations and crowd control.
"This is a tragic day for San Diego County and for California," Schwarzenegger said. "As you know, 250,000 people have been evacuated."
The fires also closed major state highways, schools and businesses and sent plumes of thick black smoke drifting across much of the state, blotting out the sun.
"We live on a mountain and there is only one way out," said Janice Edmunds, 47, who fled her San Diego County home. "We could see flames coming over the hills in Escondido at 3:30 in the morning and we started packing."
Local radio reports said 13 people had been treated at a major San Diego burn center. One person was killed on Sunday by a fire near the Mexican border.
Two fires that merged north of the city of San Diego and scorched 18,000 acres prompted authorities to order 250,000 people evacuated from an area roughly 12 square miles encompassing clusters of upscale communities, ranches and country clubs.
"It has multiple heads in multiple directions," said spokeswoman Roxanne Provaznik of the state Department of Fire and Forestry.
At least one area hospital was closed by the threat of the so-called Witch Fire, along with several nursing homes.

10,000 PEOPLE EXPECTED AT STADIUM

Southern California is in the midst of its driest year on record after rainfall just a fifth of average levels.
Scores of homes were believed to have been destroyed, but the full extent of damage was not known because dense smoke and high winds limited aerial surveillance.
Gusts of up to 75 mph (121 kph) prevented firefighters from using fixed-wing aircraft to battle the blazes, said state Fire Chief Bill Metcalf.
Authorities designated Qualcomm Stadium, where the San Diego Chargers football team plays, as an evacuation center. The nearby Del Mar Fairgrounds were opened to take in displaced horses and other livestock.
San Diego officials said they were bringing in food and water for up to 10,000 people who could be forced to spend the night in the stadium.
A blaze in the seaside celebrity enclave of Malibu that had blackened 2,400 acres was partially contained, having already destroyed 10 buildings including a landmark castle and a church.
"Our brave state, local and federal firefighters have been battling the blazes for the last 24 hours and they've done an extraordinary job," Schwarzenegger said.
He said President George W. Bush had called to offer help.
Resources were stretched to the limit. Some 10,000 firefighters were on the fire lines and more were pouring in from Northern California. Fire officials said they had asked Nevada for help and would be tapping Arizona as well.
The Santa Ana winds were forecast to gust through the mountain passes and canyons at up to 90 mph (145 kph) on Monday, while temperatures were set to top 90 degrees (32 C).
(Additional reporting by Dana Ford in Malibu, Steve Gorman in Los Angeles and Marty Graham and Ned Randolph in San Diego)

© Reuters2007All rights reserved

Read More......



Lewis Hamilton has told the BBC he does not want to win an F1 title through disqualifications for other drivers.
Kimi Raikkonen's win in Brazil secured the world title for the Finn by one point from Hamilton but McLaren are to launch an appeal into the placings.
"To have the world title taken away is a bit cruel and probably not good for the sport," Hamilton told 5live Sport.
"It would feel weird after Kimi did such a fantastic job in the last two races and won on Sunday."
Interview: McLaren's Lewis Hamilton Interview: Eddie Jordan Interview: F1 expert Murray Walker
He added: "I want to win it on the track. You want to do it in style, you want to win the race or battling it out for the lead.
"Being promoted after other people have been thrown out is not the way I want to do it."
McLaren are to challenge Sunday's result after fuel irregularities by Williams and BMW Sauber went unpunished by race stewards but Hamilton, who finished seventh, believes he will have more chances to win a world title.
"I'm only 22 and there's going to be plenty more opportunities for me to win the world championship. I have no doubt that we can do that in the future," he added.
"It has been a phenomenal year and it has just been a real pleasure to be part of the team.
"I'm extremely proud of them and of my family and everyone that's supported me to get me where I am."
Earlier, McLaren team-mate Fernando Alonso said he would be "embarrassed" if Hamilton won the world title on appeal.
"If he wins the title because of this it wouldn't be fair. I'd be embarrassed for this sport," said the Spaniard.
Alonso gave his backing to Raikkonen as a worthy winner, saying: "Raikkonen is the deserved champion.
"If you have more points, you are the deserved champion, just like in football. Kimi has won six races and Hamilton, like me, has won four."

Story from BBC SPORT:

Read More......
Monday, October 22, 2007

Asia stock markets in early slide

Several Asian stock markets, including Japan's Nikkei index, have fallen more than 3% in early trading as investors' worries about the US economy continued.

Prices on the Tokyo Stock Exchange fell 3.2% on Monday, taking the Nikkei to its lowest level since late September.

In Hong Kong, share prices fell 3.8% in the opening minutes of trade, while the Taiwan Stock Exchange lost 2.82%.

There are also fears of sharp falls on European stock markets on Monday after Friday's hefty losses on Wall Street.

The Dow Jones, the main US share index, fell 367 points on Friday, the 20th anniversary of the Black Monday stock market crash.

Most of the falls came after European markets closed, so they will have their first chance to react on Monday.

The falls were set off by concerns that the full effects of the US housing slowdown have not yet been seen.

'Pretty ugly'

It started when the building equipment firm Caterpillar cut its profit forecast, blaming the state of the economy.


"It's pretty ugly," said Bill Strazzullo, chief market strategist at Bell Curve Trading.

"A company like Caterpillar should be a poster child for global growth and benefits of the weak dollar," he said.

"It makes you question: Is global growth really that strong? Has the earnings kick from the weak dollar played itself out?"

On Black Monday, the Dow Jones fell 23%, which nowadays would mean a drop of more than 3,000 points.

"I think we're responding emotionally to the 20th anniversary of the October 1987 stock market crash," said Andy Brooks, head of trading at T Rowe Price.

"I'd like to laugh except it hurts," he added.

Read More......





Hundreds spilled into the streets in several Turkish cities to protest against PKK fighters [AFP]

Turkey has vowed strong action against Kurdish fighters after as many as 17 of its soldiers were killed in clashes sparked by an ambush near the border with Iraq.
Thirty-two fighters from the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) were also killed in fighting on Sunday, with Turkey continuing to threaten a possible incursion into northern Iraq.
Abdullah Gul, Turkey's president met Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the prime minister, and several top army officers and cabinet ministers to discuss Ankara's response to the attack.
Following the meeting, a statement from the president's office said Turkey would pay any "price" to deal with the PKK.
"While respecting the territorial integrity of Iraq, Turkey will not shy away from paying whatever price is necessary to protect its rights, its laws, its indivisible unity and its citizens," the statement said.

Turkish plans

Earlier, Vecdi Gonul, the Turkish defence minister, said a cross-border incursion into northern Iraq was on the table, but ruled out an imminent move.
"There are plans to cross the border" but "not urgently", he told reporters in Kiev, after talks with Robert Gates, the US defence secretary.
The US, which opposes any Turkish unilateral military action, strongly condemned the latest violence in Turkey's southeast and pledged co-operation with Ankara against PKK rebels.
"These attacks are unacceptable and must stop now. Attacks from Iraqi territory need to be dealt with swiftly by the Iraqi government and Kurdish regional authorities," Gordon Johndroe, a spokesman for George Bush, the US president, said.
Al Jazeera's Barnaby Phillips in Silopi, Turkey, said the situation along the border was more tense than ever.
"The question is whether Turkey's soldiers and politicians feel as though they have now been pushed too far and that they must cross into northern Iraq."

Baghdad denounces PKK

In the Iraqi capital, Nuri al-Maliki, the Iraqi prime minister, denounced the PKK attack as a "terrorist operation" in a written statement, but just hours before that, the Iraqi parliament backed a motion condemning Ankara's threat of incursions.
"Iraq's parliament unanimously votes to condemn the threat of using force to solve the dispute. It feels that the Turkish parliament's decision to use force does not boost bilateral relations," the motion said.
Iraqi Kurdish leaders said they would rebuff any attack on their territory.
Al Jazeera's Hoda Abdel-Hamid, reporting from northern Iraq, said: "The position in general in the Kurdish region is that they want to keep out of this fight.
"However, they do say if Turkey comes into northern Iraq ... they won't sit there idle watching Turkish tanks rolling through their streets and through their mountains."
Massoud Barzani, the Kurdish leader of the largely autonomous northern Iraq region, told reporters: "We are not going to be caught up in the PKK and Turkish war, but if Kurdistan region is targeted, then we are going to defend our citizens."
Speaking after a meeting with Jalal Talabani, the Iraqi president, he ruled out handing over PKK leaders to Ankara.
Talabani reiterated Barzani's comments saying that the handover of PKK leaders "was a dream that will never be realised".
Meanwhile, in Turkey, hundreds of people spilled to the streets in several cities to protest against PKK fighters.
Nearly 1,000 demonstrators carrying Turkish flags gathered in Istanbul's central Taksim area, chanting slogans against Abdullah Ocalan, the jailed PKK leader.

Clashes

Sunday's clashes close to the Iraqi border came four days after Turkey's parliament authorised cross-border raids against the PKK.
A PKK official told Al Jazeera that it attacked Turkish forces as they attempted to enter Iraq, though earlier the group claimed Turkish troops had already crossed the border.
Separately, a PKK spokesman told The Associated Press that a group of fighters killed and captured a number of Turkish forces during clashes about 70km inside Turkish territory.
"The PKK fighters were in a defensive position when they killed and injured a number of Turkish soldiers and captured another number," the spokesman, Abdul-Rahman al-Chadarchi, said without elaborating.
A statement by al-Maliki's office pledged to do everything it could to secure the release of hostages.
The Turkish military said it had launched an operation to catch the Kurdish fighters, with troops monitoring possible escape routes and shelling 63 "possible targets".
Ankara says about 3,500 PKK fighters use bases in the mountainous region across the nearby border with the autonomous Kurdish region in northern Iraq to attack Turkish targets.
The PKK wants autonomy for Turkey's predominantly Kurdish southeast and more than 30,000 people have been killed since they began their fight in 1984.

Read More......